A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
refers to a landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity from the offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to make it appropriate to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID necessary) to criminal and traffic case information in the general district courts for your purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it is actually unclear how it relates to any presented situation, typically rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances in the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for potential similar cases.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion may very well be thought of, however, we've been very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, topic to availability of vacancy issue to your approval in the competent authority. Read more
six. Mere involvement in a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, due to the fact then He's behind the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more needed for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not provide any beneficial purpose at this stage.
Typically, only an appeal accepted by the court of very last vacation resort will resolve these differences and, For several reasons, such appeals will often be not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're from the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are issue to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may be regarded, however, we're apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, issue to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval from the competent authority.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment of your state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.
This article delves into the intricacies from the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to deliver an extensive understanding of its implications and functional applications.
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness of the regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for case law definition uk certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.